Menu
Call
Contact
Blog
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Youtube

Call for Free Consultation

Toll Free 866-769-0123

866-769-0123
Menu
Kaire & Heffernan
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Youtube
  • Firm Overview
    • Mark Kaire
    • David R. Heffernan
  • Practice Areas
    • Bicycle Accidents
    • Birth Injury
    • Construction Accident
    • Car Accidents
      • How Safe Is Your Miami Route?
    • Medical Malpractice
    • Motorcycle Accidents
    • Motel and Hotel Accidents
    • Negligent Security
    • Nursing Home Abuse
    • Pedestrian Accidents
    • Personal Injury
    • Premises Liability
    • Retinal Detachment
    • Spinal Cord Injury
    • Stroke Malpractice
    • Truck Accidents
    • Traumatic Brain Injury
    • Workers Compensation
    • Wrongful Death
  • Results
  • Testimonials
  • Media
  • Safety Reports
    • Aventura Hospital
    • Baptist Hospital of Miami
    • Doctors Hospital
    • Kendall Regional Medical Center
    • Mount Sinai Medical Center
    • North Shore Medical Center
    • Palmetto General Hospital
    • South Miami Hospital
    • University of Miami Hospital
  • Blog
  • Español
  • Contact
  • Menu Menu
  • Best Lawyers
  • 9.6David Roy Heffernan
  • David R. Heffernan
    Rated by Super Lawyers


    loading ...
  • Million Dollar Advocates Form
  • Multi-Million Dollar Advocates Form
  • Florida Legal Elite
  • Top 100 Trial Lawyers
  • Top 100 Personal Injury Attorneys
left arrow right arrow

Ruling Could Limit Deaf Patients’ Access to Live Interpreters at Hospitals

June 30, 2014/in Medical Malpractice, News /by Mark Kaire

sign-languageIn a blow to disabled patients’ rights, a federal court has ruled that a hospital does not have  to provide a live interpreter for a deaf patient suffering a heart attack, when other  “effective” means are available.

Federal judges rejected the plaintiffs’ claim that a live interpreter was necessary in the midst  of an emergency, concluding the hospital’s use of written notes and gestures sufficed to meet  the hospital’s obligations under the Americans with Disability Act (ADA). The ruling could  inhibit deaf patients’ access to live interpreters at health care centers and discourage hospitals from supplying live means of communication to the hearing impaired.

The case of Martin v. Halifax Healthcare Systems, Inc. involved three completely deaf individuals who visited Halifax Hospital on different occasions. One patient visited the health care center during a heart attack, another after a fall and a third patient accompanied her pregnant daughter to the hospital during delivery. The patients’ primary means of communication is American Sign Language.

All three contended the defendants failed to provide live sign language interpreters during at least some portions of their stay, in violation of Title III of the ADA. Title III requires that public accommodations provide “auxiliary aids and services” to ensure “effective communication” with persons with hearing disabilities.  The nature, length, complexity, and context of the communication at issue and the individual’s normal method of communication must be considered before assessing whether a particular service must be provided.

Two of the patients were provided with an interpreter on some occasions, but other times communicated with hospital staff by written note, gestures and in some instances, a video relay interpreting service. The plaintiffs argued that anything aside from an ASL interpreter was inappropriate for treatment or a hospitalization involving complicated medical procedures and terminology. However, the U.S. District Court Middle District of Florida said there was no evidence that the alternative methods of communication precluded the patients’ understanding of their circumstances or medical treatment. Additionally, the court ruled there was no testimony or other evidence that any plaintiff would have reached a different decision about treatment options or reached a more beneficial result if the medical providers had communicated via a live ASL interpreter.

The decision could influence future cases in which the availability of a live ASL interpreter at a hospital is in dispute. Federal judges said in their opinion there is no current precedent obligating a hospital to provide an interpreter on every medical interaction with a deaf person. Numerous court rulings have influenced how provisions of the ADA are interpreted. The hearing impaired and their family members should ensure they understand their rights under the ADA and what services are required to be provided.

From a medical malpractice perspective, this creates quite a quandary. Where communication is key, and a doctor fails to understand a patients complaints and likewise fails to appropriately treat that patient within the applicable standard of care, can the doctor be sued? can the hospital be held liable?

 

Related Articles

1,000 People Die Per Day As a Result of Hospital Errors

Medical Malpractice Lawsuits Improve Patient Safety

Medical Malpractice Frequent Questions

 

Photo Credit: daveynin cc

Mark Kaire

Mark Kaire has been practicing law in Miami for nearly 15 years. He is dedicated to helping the injured people of Miami receive compensation. Mr. Kaire has been blogging on Miami’s legal issues for 4 years.

Share this entry
  • Share on WhatsApp

Do you have a case?

Get your question answered

Recent Posts

  • Miami Nursing Home Negligence Lawyer
  • (no title)
  • Safety Tips During Holiday Shopping
  • Miami Surgical Malpractice Lawyer
  • TEXTING AND DRIVING ACCIDENTS IN MIAMI

Categories

  • Bike Accidents
  • Birth Injury
  • Car Accidents
  • Construction Accidents
  • Medical Malpractice
  • Negligent Security
  • News
  • Nursing Home Abuse
  • Personal Injury
  • Workers Compensation

How can we help?

Do you have a case?

Get your question answered
 

Kaire & Heffernan, LLC

999 Brickell Ave, PH 1102
Miami, FL 33131
Phone: 305-372-0123  
KaireHeffernan_map
  • Firm Overview
  • Practice Areas
  • Results
  • Testimonials
  • Blog
  • Español
  • Contact Us
Copyright © 1999 - 2021. Kaire & Heffernan - All Rights Reserved. | Sitemap | Disclaimer
 
Negligent Security Case Goes To Jury Strokes On The Rise For Teenagers And Young Adults